Hydrogen Supply Agreement: Negotiations in terra incognita

June 15, 2026 | Reading time: 12 minutes
10,000 tons of green hydrogen per year: What sounds like the conclusion of a standard supply agreement actually marked a pioneering achievement involving Salzgitter AG and its partner EWE. How to negotiate a contract without any existing templates – and what this entails for the steel industry.
Established arrangements, tried-and-tested clauses, existing regulations, and well-established market processes: Negotiating energy supply contracts – as in securing the supply of gas, for example – is a routine task for two companies that can usually be completed in a matter of weeks or months. Normally, that is. The situation is different with the hydrogen supply contract inked in early June between Salzgitter AG and the energy supplier EWE from Oldenburg: This is due to the fact that there were neither templates nor sufficient guidelines for such an agreement that the negotiating parties could use as a reference.
“The negotiations kicked off in 2024 – and literally with a blank sheet of paper,” recalls Lennart Schümann, an expert on energy strategy and procurement at Salzgitter AG. It took almost two years to cover all the ground, connect all the dots and get the signatures down on paper. What might suggest inefficiency or even disagreements between the contracting parties at first glance is nothing more than an indication of a complex process in which many fundamental questions had to be answered for the very first time.
The bidding process: From more than 100 providers down to a single partner
As early as the summer of 2024, Salzgitter AG put out an international tender for the supply of up to 150,000 tons of renewable hydrogen per year. The response was overwhelming. More than 100 companies from every continent – with the exception of Antarctica – participated in the tender and offered a total of more than one million tons of hydrogen. This was followed by a multi-stage process in which EWE, as a national provider, ultimately prevailed.
The Negotiations: Three factors make the process complex
What sounds like a traditional procurement process was, in practice, genuine pioneering groundwork. This is because many issues that have long been settled in other energy supply contracts – such as how supply volumes are recorded or billed, or what purity level the energy sources must meet – had to be negotiated here without any precedent to refer to. The reasons:
- No model agreements: Hydrogen is a hybrid – a molecule that behaves like a gas, but whose production is driven by the electricity market. While existing templates from the gas or electricity sectors, such as PPAs or gas supply contracts, may provide a useful guide, they are only of limited use as templates.
- Regulatory frameworks under development: Standards for grid infeed, accounting, purity requirements, and the respective measurements have not yet been finalized for hydrogen. Hydrogen supply contracts must currently be based on regulations that, in some cases, are only just being developed.
- An immature supplier market: To date, most hydrogen projects have existed only on paper. The facilities are often not built until after a contract has been signed with a future customer. It is therefore difficult to compare providers' prices, capacities, and delivery capabilities. And negotiating a hypothetical offer requires an entirely new set of evaluation criteria. What’s more, the hydrogen core network is also still under development.
What is IPCEI?
IPCEI (Important Projects of Common European Interest) is a European funding instrument for projects that extend beyond the interests of a single Member State. The funding program provides government grants for projects that are highly innovative and of strategic significance – such as the development of a European hydrogen economy.
Why EWE: The decision-making criteria
Here’s what made EWE an attractive partner: The Lower Saxony-based energy company is operating an IPCEI-funded electrolysis project, which is scheduled to come online before 2028. As a result, the grid fees for the electrolyzer will be waived as scheduled. This regulation currently applies to all facilities that begin hydrogen production before August 4, 2029. Furthermore, the strict requirements of the RFNBO regulations regarding so-called “additionality” – that is, for all renewable energy sources not derived from biomass – do not yet apply. This lowers the price of green hydrogen.
In addition, EWE is operating its own trading house, which enables the company to efficiently manage its electricity portfolio. This is another way to control hydrogen costs, since electricity costs account for more than half the price of hydrogen in the electrolysis process. Supply is by way of Germany’s hydrogen core network – without long transport distances or reliance on imports.
RFNBO criteria
The RFNBO criteria define the conditions under which hydrogen and other synthetic fuels are considered “renewable fuels of non-biological origin” and therefore contribute to EU targets. Essentially, these criteria require an entirely new base of power production, demand high greenhouse gas reductions compared to fossil alternatives (at least 70%), and set out requirements on additionality and temporal and spatial correlation between renewable energy generation and fuel production.
What the agreement signifies for climate-friendly steel production
The supply contract now secures Salzgitter AG approximately 10,000 tons of renewable hydrogen per year – an additional component alongside its own 100-MW electrolysis plant, which will produce approximately 9,000 tons annually starting as from mid-2027. Together, these two sources cover a significant, but a still small share of the total demand for the direct reduction plant, which stands at 150,000 tons. Nevertheless, the group has decided specifically to not issue any further calls for proposals for the time being, until a more clearly defined regulatory framework is in place and progress is made on the development of the hydrogen backbone network.
“This is not an abstract risk”
Three questions for Lennart Schümann, our expert for energy strategy and procurement.
10,000 tons of hydrogen per year – out of a total requirement of 150,000 tons for the direct reduction plant: is this the proverbial drop in the bucket?
It is, at the very least, a significant initial step and the first hydrogen supply contract of this scale for the steel industry. Starting as from mid-2027, our own 100-MW electrolysis plant will be supplying approximately 9,000 tons; in 2030, EWE will add 10,000 tons by way of the core network. That amounts to just under 20,000 tons – which is a significant contribution, but still a long way from the projected future demand of up to 150,000 tons. We are very well aware of this gap, but we still need improvements to the political and regulatory framework. As soon as market conditions allow, we will launch additional procurement rounds.
A contract with a multitude of terms, conditions and dependencies. Will green hydrogen really be flowing to Salzgitter as from 2030?
EWE will be able to deliver by the agreed-upon date. I'm sure of that. But the core network must also be ready on schedule. There is no alternative or workaround – no pipelines, no molecules. Otherwise, this will result in actual costs for both EWE and us: The electrolyzer has been built; it would deteriorate over time, while the financing is ongoing, incurring interest costs. This is not some abstract risk; it's economics and business management. In addition, to take further steps in hydrogen procurement, we now need reliable regulations as soon as possible: an adjustment to the RFNBO criteria, electricity price compensation beyond 2030, and green lead markets that ensure that there will be a reliable demand for green steel.
Salzgitter AG is leading the way as a pioneer – but is currently refraining from putting additional capacity up for tender. Isn't that contradictory?
No, that's consistent. We have shown that such an agreement is feasible – in spite of all the obstacles. But given today's cost conditions, this cannot be a viable model for the next 130,000 tons without external funding. We are stating clearly: We will take the first step. But for this to gain momentum, policymakers and the markets must follow suit. Otherwise, there is the risk that this agreement will remain an exception.
Discover similar posts
Close-up: A Child of the Steelworks
From the blast furnace to the DRP: Marvin Brandeis helps shape the future of steel.
Read postSteel at home in residential construction
Fast, sustainable, and cost-effective: from modular developments combatting the housing shortage to affordable single-family homes for every stage of life – groundbreaking projects showcase the future of building with steel.
Read postThe address of this article has been copied to your clipboard.




